Blog Directory logo  Blog Directory
  •  Login
  • Register
  • Submit a Blog in Featured for only $10 with PaypalFeatured BlogsBlog Listing
    © 2025, Blog Directory
     | 
    Google Pagerank: 
    PRchecker.info
     | 
    Support
    Member - { Blog Details }

    hero image

    blog address: http://www.editingindia.com/proofreading/

    keywords: manuscript proofreading services, academic proofreading, scientific paper proofreading, research paper proofreading, PhD proofreading, Thesis proofreading

    member since: Apr 22, 2015 | Viewed: 206

    5 polite ways of communicating with a Peer Reviewer

    Category: Education

    Most Researchers, Authors, and PhD students find it extremely difficult to respond to a peer reviewer. However, panicking wouldn’t help nor you can give up communication with them because of your difficulties and fear. It is advisable to get your research paper once checked from professionals offering manuscript proofreading services. Follow a simple rule when responding to peer reviewer comments, ‘Treat your reviewers in the manner you would like yourself to be treated’. There are certain instances where the intended meaning of your manuscript is different from what the reviewer perceives. In such situations, it is important to maintain your cool and express your viewpoint politely to them. Remember, reviewers act as a second eye in reviewing your research work, and thus contribute majorly to shaping your scholarly article prior to presenting it to the readers. Therefore, they openly bring forth major critical flaws. Thus, one should avoid counter arguments and rude tone when communicating with them. However, this doesn’t imply that you agree and accept all their suggestions. Also, you can get your research paper once read from companies that offer manuscript proofreading services. Mentioned below are 5 polite ways to communicate with a peer reviewer: 1. What you’re willing to say: Failed to understand what we wrote? What you must say: We agree that several statements that we made were more ambiguous than intended. We have revised the text for further clarity. 2. What you’re willing to say: The answer to that question is unknown. What you must say: This is a valid question, and we are curious to know what the results would be. However, we are unaware of any studies that have provided the answer. 3. What you’re willing to say: The experiment would go on forever! What you must say: The experiment suggested is interesting and will provide added information, but it falls beyond the scope of the study. 4. What you’re willing to say: You are being extremely fussy about grammar and formatting! What you must say: We are sorry for this error. The text has been corrected as suggested. 5. What you’re willing to say: My English writing skills are good; then why typo complains? What you must say: The research paper has been edited and reviewed by a coworker who has looked over to correct the errors.



    { More Related Blogs }
               Submit a Blog
               Submit a Blog
    Optimizing Spatial Navigation: Insights from Radial Arm Maze Experiments

    Education

    Optimizing Spatial Navigation:...


    Jun 9, 2023
    Internet Speed Test Tool

    Education

    Internet Speed Test Tool...


    Aug 5, 2021
    Understanding ITIL and Enterprise Architecture Effectively with ITIL Foundation certification

    Education

    Understanding ITIL and Enterpr...


    Jun 23, 2015
    Why Choose SyntaxLevelUp for Full Stack Developer Training in Pune?

    Education

    Why Choose SyntaxLevelUp for F...


    Nov 6, 2024
    WHAT ARE FUTURE READY COURSES

    Education

    WHAT ARE FUTURE READY COURSES...


    Dec 30, 2023
    Your Way To Success In BA

    Education

    Your Way To Success In BA...


    Sep 6, 2022